Not Logged In Log In   Sign Up   Points Leaders
Follow Us    5:58 AM

GasBuddy News Article

20
votes
AP IMPACT: Clunker pickups traded for new pickups

Associated Press -- WASHINGTON – The most common deals under the government's $3 billion Cash for Clunkers program, aimed at putting more fuel-efficient cars on the road, replaced old Ford or Chevrolet pickups with new ones that got only marginally better gas mileage, according to an analysis of new federal data by The Associated Press.

The single most common swap — which occurred more than 8,200 times — involved Ford F150 pickup owners who took advantage of a government rebate to trade their old trucks for new Ford F150s. They were 17 times more likely to buy a new F150 than, say, a Toyota Prius. The fuel economy for the new trucks ranged from 15 mpg to 17 mpg based on engine size and other factors, an improvement of just 1 mpg to 3 mpg over the clunkers.

Owners of thousands more large old Chevrolet an


Read the Full Article

Submitted Nov 04, 2009 By: CarrottopNe
Category: Daily News Article Discussions > Topics Add to favorite topics   Post new topicPost New Topic
Author Topic: AP IMPACT: Clunker pickups traded for new pickups Topic is locked Back to Topics
REPLIES (newest first)
Profile Pic
call911ok
All-Star Author Vancouver

Posts:544
Points:75,890
Joined:Mar 2009
Message Posted: Nov 6, 2009 1:58:33 PM

well, most people buy pickups because they use the features with the bed... unless you buy a pickup and don't use its features, then you can sacrifice an economic vehicle... people hae to start to understand that pickups are a convenience feature.
Profile Pic
FuelBarge
Champion Author Long Island

Posts:4,133
Points:1,094,040
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Nov 5, 2009 7:32:17 AM

No shock in this report. Cash for clunkers pretty much replaced one guzzler with another. If we do this every couple of years, the owners of gas guzzlers can live off of the government incentives and keep wasting gas. A better idea would have been to pick an age such as ten years and declare any vehicle older than that age qualified.
Profile Pic
NavyStore
Champion Author Seattle

Posts:2,681
Points:1,182,700
Joined:Aug 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 11:27:01 PM

No surprise here. If you look at my posts during the 'Clunkers' program I was stating that it should be limited to domestic manufacturers and at least 7 MPG better mileage. I still think it was a good program to get cash flowing thru the economy, but I still say it should have been focused on helping Americans - not any other nation.

Unfortunately the pro-business Republican (or since they are purging the moderates should we just call them the Conservative party?) didn't want to help America, just their Corporate masters. Just another reason why we need Publicly-Funded elections.
Profile Pic
N5EXY
All-Star Author Austin

Posts:555
Points:530,410
Joined:Jul 2004
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:54:54 PM

That is EXACTLY what I would have done - if my F150 had not been two years too old to qualify. What did they expect for such a handout? Buy a minitruck
that is too small to haul anything? The same old change.
Profile Pic
Chitowner
Champion Author Omaha

Posts:2,059
Points:578,180
Joined:Jul 2007
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:34:59 PM

What do you expect from a government run program? and you want these idiots taxing you for the climate change myth and cap and trade programs. Oh yeah and run a health care program after screwing up Medicare???????????

Hello wake you and vote the idiots out of office or look forward to only being able to afford boloney sandwiches just like in prison...........
Profile Pic
snewwee
Champion Author Detroit

Posts:4,969
Points:1,010,105
Joined:Sep 2007
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:33:39 PM

The whole clunker program was just that 'a clunker' and bunker.
Profile Pic
PissedCanuck
Champion Author Toronto

Posts:3,818
Points:816,630
Joined:Nov 2006
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:30:50 PM

This is change that I really can believe in.
Profile Pic
MRED3
Champion Author Jacksonville

Posts:2,235
Points:437,295
Joined:May 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:22:37 PM

It was to help the UAW out and to make Obama like good.
Profile Pic
cutter1330
Champion Author Oklahoma

Posts:3,111
Points:716,135
Joined:Jul 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:18:07 PM

Obamanomics for you to try, change you can believe in or not.
Profile Pic
Rednix
Champion Author Miami

Posts:1,628
Points:337,790
Joined:Jul 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:17:56 PM

I would be surprised if anyone traded a F150 for a Prius.
Profile Pic
Hugo40
Champion Author Kentucky

Posts:2,723
Points:647,010
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:16:48 PM

It took this long for this fact to surface?
Profile Pic
dbatw
Champion Author St. Louis

Posts:1,686
Points:341,165
Joined:Apr 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:13:13 PM

so let's see what this really means. Looks like we bailed out Ford too. Just in a different way. Didn't FoMoCo just report outstanding quarterly results? Yup, thank you very much clunkers. And where do they make the most profit. Yup, F150. We got sucker again. You can bet their execs will get fat bonus checks.
Profile Pic
e3p0
Champion Author Columbus

Posts:2,179
Points:583,090
Joined:Mar 2006
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:11:56 PM

The only thing clunkers did was GIVE the Japanese and Koreans a couple of billion dollars. Sad when the Russians put together a better program than our leaders did. Russians did not send any money to the Japanese or Koreans.
Profile Pic
E-Squirrel
Champion Author Orange County

Posts:1,625
Points:425,805
Joined:Feb 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:10:51 PM

No surprises here. Government plans like this virtually never do what they are promised or expected to do. Just remember, these same people want to be in charge of everything else in your life too.
Profile Pic
graceman
Champion Author Baltimore

Posts:1,268
Points:427,700
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:06:37 PM

Still not enough
Profile Pic
Z51Corvette
Champion Author Austin

Posts:4,120
Points:799,890
Joined:Jan 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 10:06:12 PM

Sorry those figures on the trucks are not as good as what some owners I know are telling me. Trucks are now in the 20mpg range... Almost double the old models!!!
Profile Pic
YLHandyman
Champion Author Orange County

Posts:4,579
Points:828,795
Joined:Feb 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:58:58 PM

Maybe we all should have traded up when we had the chance.
Profile Pic
sillywagon
Champion Author New York

Posts:5,246
Points:527,495
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:57:58 PM

Duh! Of course it didn't work well. It was a Government program designed by bureaucrats... of course at taxpayer expense. What a waste.

[Edited by: sillywagon at 11/4/2009 9:58:16 PM EST]
Profile Pic
slgas
Champion Author Houston

Posts:1,022
Points:581,665
Joined:Oct 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:56:13 PM

At least they followed the rules.
Profile Pic
timdtune
All-Star Author Virginia

Posts:634
Points:132,710
Joined:Feb 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:50:25 PM

More stipulations should have been placed on the trade ups. This did get the car industry back on the map.
Profile Pic
NavyEOD
Champion Author Los Angeles

Posts:5,129
Points:1,056,590
Joined:Jul 2007
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:48:59 PM

This is not right.
Profile Pic
DancingDee
Champion Author Gary

Posts:2,631
Points:681,180
Joined:Jul 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:45:04 PM

That's what I heard as early as last month!!
Profile Pic
mlambo
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:7,491
Points:1,708,660
Joined:Mar 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:39:15 PM

I read over 50 % of the cars bought were foreign made. I think the American taxpayer got clunkered
Profile Pic
Ken2OD
Champion Author Grand Rapids

Posts:4,073
Points:994,535
Joined:Dec 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:38:39 PM

When all is said and done, and all the results have been analyzed, we will find out who got screwed on this deal. I still have a funny feeling about the CLUNKER PROGRAM in the entrails of my bowels.
Profile Pic
2granny
Champion Author Michigan

Posts:4,212
Points:483,075
Joined:Apr 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:37:26 PM

The cash for clunkers program was a waste. What people didn't know is that they have to pay taxes on the money they received. Also the taxpayers are paying.
Profile Pic
dollarwatcher
Champion Author Wisconsin

Posts:2,982
Points:558,775
Joined:Mar 2007
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:37:07 PM

O is mad cause he got out-foxed. I'll buy what I want to. Don't need no government tellin me what to drive.
Profile Pic
foxups
Champion Author Toledo

Posts:3,252
Points:645,060
Joined:Feb 2004
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:31:15 PM

at least they bought american
Profile Pic
dbatw
Champion Author St. Louis

Posts:1,686
Points:341,165
Joined:Apr 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:27:38 PM

criminal! Old gas wasters replaced by new gas wasters? How stupid. Hey, I want a subsidy for replacing my 1988 BMW with a new one! $24,000 would work pretty well.
Profile Pic
nightworker998
All-Star Author Maryland

Posts:714
Points:300,810
Joined:Mar 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:27:36 PM

This is the result of starting a program without all the rules in place typical for congress( regardless of the party in charge)
Profile Pic
roadkillGA
Champion Author Georgia

Posts:3,382
Points:485,950
Joined:Jun 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:18:05 PM

It cost the tax payer $24,000 for each person that bought a car with the cash for clunker deal.
Profile Pic
andyrew
All-Star Author Baltimore

Posts:501
Points:362,895
Joined:Aug 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:09:24 PM

this is because it was a stupid idea to begin with. car sales were up for a month, then right back in the hole. fuel economy overall didnt improve. it was just a way to spend more money and make the dems look good. morons
Profile Pic
bbreff
Champion Author Atlanta

Posts:5,149
Points:1,634,145
Joined:Jun 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:07:50 PM



The program did little good to help the economy. It just put a few new vehicles on the road.

Profile Pic
DEG
Champion Author Las Vegas

Posts:12,803
Points:2,543,205
Joined:Jul 2003
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:01:58 PM

The cash for clunkers program was bad for the economy and didn't get the reduction in gas consumption that the administration had wanted. The same is likely to happen with the massively expensive (and unneeded) health care reform bill if it ever passes.
Profile Pic
playtimeCLE
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:3,175
Points:589,710
Joined:Nov 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 9:01:55 PM

A guy I work with did that.
Profile Pic
dmark101
Veteran Author Los Angeles

Posts:412
Points:77,160
Joined:Oct 2009
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:59:13 PM

i read this earlier elsewhere and got a huge laugh out of it when i did. i'll bet nobama didn't plan for that to happen did he?
Profile Pic
madison8359
Champion Author Cleveland

Posts:2,862
Points:618,610
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:59:03 PM

Why quibble, the program put lots of people to work, put money into their pockets and the economy, what did you expect from a government program, perfection?

Profile Pic
LanguageMan1
Champion Author Tampa

Posts:5,941
Points:687,420
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:57:26 PM

Doesn't surprise me one bit.
Profile Pic
BlueVanGroup
Champion Author Colorado

Posts:2,238
Points:571,435
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:52:40 PM

Oh no! People bought the cars/trucks they wanted instead of what the politicians think they should have?
Profile Pic
Buck_on_Bass
Champion Author Tennessee

Posts:2,776
Points:594,905
Joined:Jul 2007
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:48:21 PM

Many labels were placed upon the program to get it through Congress. The labels may or may not have described the program accurately. For vehicles under 8500 pounds, the rules were pretty clear. What may have changed the rules was the registration weight for the license plate. If a truck has a 9000 pound plate but the vehicle alone is 5800 pounds, is the vehicle considered to be less than 8500 pounds or over 8500 pounds? The rebate rules changed at 8500 pounds.
Profile Pic
SSchmidty
Champion Author Illinois

Posts:4,311
Points:815,365
Joined:Mar 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:47:27 PM

Oh my, why was this even encouraged? one gas guzzler for another?!
Profile Pic
TRAIN RIDER
Champion Author San Bernardino

Posts:4,246
Points:1,791,140
Joined:Oct 2004
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:46:17 PM

BESIDES THIS NOT DOING WHAT IT WAS INTENDED TO DO, WE ALSO HAVE THE HEALTH CARE WHICH WON'T DO WHAT THEY WANT WITH OUT BREAKING THE BANK.
Profile Pic
DellMan
Champion Author Omaha

Posts:1,917
Points:442,925
Joined:Apr 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:44:06 PM

Programs like this are what you get when you put an inexperienced person in the Whitehouse. He brought in some of the most liberal people there are and they are really running the country. He tells them what he wants and they play enforcer. We are headed towards becoming a Communist/Socialist country. The more Obama and his crowd get control of these the worse off we will be. Health Care reforms scare the living daylights out of me, if they pass it the way it is we won't be able to afford insurance or the fines for not buying it. Pelosi's bill assumes most people would rather pay the fine. What happens when people buy government insurance and the government can't afford everyone?
Profile Pic
Ramaniac
Champion Author St. Louis

Posts:10,087
Points:1,713,205
Joined:Sep 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:35:50 PM

I traded a 1995 Dodge Ram for a 2009 Avenger doubling my gas mileage. The ram had 210,000 plus
Profile Pic
hauler43
Champion Author Oakland

Posts:4,799
Points:1,851,580
Joined:Sep 2003
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:30:14 PM

Who wrote the parameters for the trade-ins? Remember it is also what one can afford and use to driving.
Profile Pic
kidrockTX
Champion Author Fort Worth

Posts:3,854
Points:507,845
Joined:Sep 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:23:52 PM

after 10 months in office still can not do anything good he chould have gave the money to the poor and homeless but he will never learn
Profile Pic
signwiz
Champion Author Indiana

Posts:1,081
Points:933,625
Joined:Feb 2006
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:21:44 PM

Just a popular program designed for mass appeal at any cost.
Profile Pic
sabob
Champion Author Pennsylvania

Posts:1,688
Points:225,725
Joined:Dec 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:17:17 PM

that's what happens when they throw money at things instead of letting the free market take care of it. I didn't vote for him!!!!!!!!
Profile Pic
K1500
Champion Author Birmingham

Posts:1,055
Points:187,170
Joined:May 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:10:40 PM

No way, Obama thought through the possible results of the program and had this solved! If only people would have realized this is the type of stuff that inexperience brings. We tried to warn them...
Profile Pic
djgunrunner
Champion Author Salt Lake City

Posts:4,794
Points:1,379,690
Joined:Apr 2005
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 8:00:25 PM

My '03 Dodge Ram with a 5.9 Cummins averaged 19.5 mpg for 3,800 miles. Driving in National Parks, citys and highways. This could have been improved upon had their been a better axel ratio and a 6 speed transmission that had an overdrive and no compound gears.
Profile Pic
papagreg
Champion Author Sacramento

Posts:1,527
Points:512,700
Joined:Jan 2008
Message Posted: Nov 4, 2009 7:54:29 PM

I second the thought, rodzilla123!!!! This is just more BS shoveled on us by Comrad Obama.
Topic is locked Back to Topics